Skip to content

Conversation

adamantike
Copy link
Contributor

With this change, having a panel status set in the cookies exits earlier, as it isn't needed to retrieve the Django settings and panel name to calculate the default value.

With this change, having a panel status set in the cookies exits earlier,
as it isn't needed to retrieve the Django settings and panel name to
calculate the default value.
def enabled(self):
def enabled(self) -> bool:
# The user's cookies should override the default value
cookie_value = self.toolbar.request.COOKIES.get("djdt" + self.panel_id)
Copy link
Member

@tim-schilling tim-schilling Sep 25, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If a user has enabled a panel (creating a cookie value of "on"), then changes their settings file to disable it, wouldn't this override the customized settings?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If I understand correctly, that's the same behavior we have today, as the default value is only used when a cookie value is not found in the request.

This shouldn't change how a panel status is decided, just to return faster when the cookie is set.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're correct. DebugToolbar.get_panel_classes is what I was worried about. I wanted to make sure that a developer was still able to stop using a panel even if the cookies are set.

@tim-schilling tim-schilling merged commit f138780 into django-commons:main Sep 25, 2022
@tim-schilling
Copy link
Member

Thank you for the PR!

@adamantike adamantike deleted the fix/simplify-panel-enabled-property branch October 17, 2022 20:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants